Re: lost output from asynchronous lists

2008-11-01 Thread Sven Mascheck
Eric Blake wrote: > According to Stephane Chazelas on 10/29/2008 3:32 AM: : > stdout > stderr >>> >>> For shell portability, I'll write the first line as >>> : > stdout >>> : > stderr >>> though. >> >> Why? > > It fails on old Ultrix sh, which can't redirect the same fd more than once

read + SIGWINCH - strange error

2008-11-01 Thread Antonio Macchi
If I run this script in xterm, and I maximize (not resize) the window, I'll get (nearly always) a very strange error... something like ./test: line 17: wait_for: No record of process 22659 but if I use 'read' without timing or with a very long time ( -t10 ) the error does not raise. ---