Re: Escaping of exclamation marks inside quotes seems wrong

2007-10-17 Thread Bob Proulx
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When trying to produce an exclamation mark (!) inside a quoted > string is behaving differently from expected. I cannot see a > way of producing an exclamation mark inside a doubly-quoted > (") string in the bash prompt. You are correct. However

Tab Completion Ignores Files with Apostrophes

2007-10-17 Thread Dmitry Denisov
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: x86_64 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64' -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu' -DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKAGE

Escaping of exclamation marks inside quotes seems wrong

2007-10-17 Thread tmacieir
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: i586 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i586' -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i586-mandriva-linux-gnu' -DCONF_VENDOR='mandriva' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -

Re: Can't unset function with unusual names

2007-10-17 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Chet Ramey wrote: >> Even so, if neither -f nor -v are given, you should apply both naming rules. > > If neither option is supplied, the name is required to refer to a variable, > and the variable naming rules must be followed. > > The real problem

Incorrect error reporting for arithmetics

2007-10-17 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: x86_64 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64' -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-l

RE: bash -n doesn't seem to catch all syntax errors...

2007-10-17 Thread Ken Failbus
Thanks for your reply. That would certainly help. Regards, Ken -Original Message- From: Chet Ramey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 9:51 PM To: Ken Failbus Cc: Andreas Schwab; bug-bash@gnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bash -n doesn't seem to catch all syn

Re: Can't unset function with unusual names

2007-10-17 Thread Chet Ramey
> Even so, if neither -f nor -v are given, you should apply both naming rules. If neither option is supplied, the name is required to refer to a variable, and the variable naming rules must be followed. The real problem was ever allowing functions with invalid names to be created. Chet -- ``Th