Dawid Gołuński wrote:
> I think, the problem is connected with a bad argv[0] comparison. It is,
> when rbash is called directly from bash level, the argv[0] equals
> "rbash", and when rbash is called at login, argv[0] is
> equal to "-rbash". So i thought maybe there was something like this:
>
> i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do
> not change]:
> Machine: i586
> OS: linux-gnu
> Compiler: gcc -I/usr/src/packages/BUILD/bash-3.2
> -L/usr/src/packages/BUILD/bash-3.2/../readline-5.2
> Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash'
> -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i586' -
Hello bug-bash,
I've just come across a strange problem. It's connected with
restricted mode of bash program.
When I invoke bash like this: /bin/bash -r it runs correctly into
restricted mode:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ /bin/bash -r
bash: SHELL: readonly variable
bash: PATH: readonly variable
> Thank you for wonderful software to which I'm indebted every day.
Thanks for your kind words.
> I have one question.
>
> Why be not consistent path of patch ?
> ex) "../bash-3.2-patched/", "../bash-3.2.9/", "../bash-3.2.11/"
Because it doesn't matter -- `patch' doesn't care.
Chet
--
``The
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Specifying the key combo shift+tab is not documented.
Your terminal program probably doesn't distinguish tab from
shift+tab. To check, try running od, and type tab, enter, shift+tab,
enter, and see if od prints the same codes for both.
paul
___
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do
not change]:
Machine: i586
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc -I/usr/src/packages/BUILD/bash-3.2
-L/usr/src/packages/BUILD/bash-3.2/../readline-5.2
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash'
-DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i586' -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu'
-DCONF_MACHTYPE=
Thank you for wonderful software to which I'm indebted every day.
I have one question.
Why be not consistent path of patch ?
ex) "../bash-3.2-patched/", "../bash-3.2.9/", "../bash-3.2.11/"
If it's necessary, I write patch that corrects path of patch.
Sorry, my poor English...
--
Takuomi Kag
