Chet Ramey wrote:
Description:
$ echo $((40*40)
-2446744073709551616
Repeat-By:
Do some arithmetic in bash $(()).
If the numbers are out of range, the output will be wrong in
all sorts of interesting ways. No error message is given.
Fix:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
> Machine: i386
> OS: linux-gnu
> Compiler: gcc
> Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i386'
> -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i386-pc-linux-gnu'
> -DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCA
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: i386
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i386'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i386-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKAGE='ba
Hi,
IMO a dabbrev-expand implementation in readline would be a good idea.
In emacs dabbrev-expand is bound by default to M-/
(AFAIK emacs had the original implementation for this idea. It is now
present in tcsh too)
What dabbrev-expand could do in readline/bash is to complete the word
the curs
Richard Neill wrote:
> Bash Version: 3.2
> Patch Level: 13
> Release Status: release
>
> Description:
> $ echo $((40*40)
> -2446744073709551616
>
> Repeat-By:
> Do some arithmetic in bash $(()).
> If the numbers are out of range, the output will be wro
shirish agarwal wrote:
> Most of us use bash by default. And bash is not intuitive atleast for
> people who are new to the system. I'm sure there have been suggestions made
> for this before & would be made after me and I guess the people maintaining
> bash would have some valid points why t
