Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Бојан Ландекић wrote:
> >Is it possible to put bash on some portable media and use it on a
> >system that is bash-less without worrying about dependencies?
>
> Not unless you build it statically, it isn't. :-) Although I think if
> you build bash it gives you all the libr
Бојан Ландекић wrote:
On 27-Feb-07, at 2:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
IIRC we were talking about why e.g. 'ls' would not run 'which ls',
right? In that case "correct" could be said to mean that 'which '
("which" is assumed to execute in a new environment, that is it is not
implemented as a sh
On 27-Feb-07, at 2:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
IIRC we were talking about why e.g. 'ls' would not run 'which ls',
right? In that case "correct" could be said to mean that 'which '
("which" is assumed to execute in a new environment, that is it is not
implemented as a shell alias or shell fu
