Waist Magnetic Trimmer

2005-03-30 Thread cat
Sky Products Factory Product name: Waist Magnetic Trimmer QTY:1000PCS The materials : Neoprene and Magnetic USD10.00/PC (with shipping cost) http://hk.page.auctions.yahoo.com/hk/auction/1109185390?aucview=user Thanks, Janet ___ Bug-bash mailing l

Re: Bash printf builtin bug

2005-03-30 Thread Luke Kendall
On 30 Mar, Paul Jarc wrote: > Ok. coreutils' printf does handle the "--" case. But other strings > beginning with "-" are treated as format strings. I think that > conforms, but I agree that it's less useful. Solaris printf is the > only one I can find that agrees with coreutils; {Free,N

Mail Delivery (failure bug-bash@gnu.org)

2005-03-30 Thread p . hoad
Norman Virus Control a supprimé le message original qui contenait le virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash

Re: Bash printf builtin bug

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Jarc
Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The SUSv3 has `none' in the OPTIONS section of the printf description. > The description of that value in the `Utility Description Defaults' > section of the standard requires that commands which accept operands > but not options to recognize `--' and handle

Re: Bash printf builtin bug

2005-03-30 Thread Chet Ramey
Paul Jarc wrote: > Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>That's what the `--' first argument is for: don't treat any remaining >>arguments as possible options. > > > Does printf have any options? If not is there any point in giving an > error in this case? ISTM SUSv3 requires the first ar

Re: Bash printf builtin bug

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Jarc
Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's what the `--' first argument is for: don't treat any remaining > arguments as possible options. Does printf have any options? If not is there any point in giving an error in this case? ISTM SUSv3 requires the first argument to be a format string, r

Re: Bash printf builtin bug

2005-03-30 Thread Chet Ramey
Luke Kendall wrote: > On 29 Mar, Chet Ramey wrote: > >> That's what the `--' first argument is for: don't treat any remaining >> arguments as possible options. > > > In that sense, I suppose it *is* consistent with all the other > commands. It's just a trap that the user must be aware of (as

Almacenes e Inventarios

2005-03-30 Thread Perfiles Mercadologicos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash