* Bruno Haible wrote on Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:14:43PM CET:
>
[ a good patch that I think there's no need to wait longer for approval ]
>
> Oops, I meant to remove only data.lock here. The suggested patch is this:
Thanks again, I've applied this to branch-1-10 and HEAD.
Cheers,
Ralf
2007-01-27
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > ## This code is being executed by the first process.
> > rm -f data.stamp; \
> > $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) data.stamp; \
> > result=$$?; rm -rf data.lock data.stamp; exit $$result; \
>
> Do you really want to remove t
Hello Bruno,
Thank you for the bug report.
* Bruno Haible wrote on Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:04:20PM CET:
> 2) When the first branch of the "if mkdir ..." is executed, the data.lock
> directory is never removed. It should be removed after the recursive $(MAKE)
> invocation, preserving the return co
Hi,
The automake-1.10 documentation contains this sample rule:
data.c data.h data.w data.x: data.stamp
## Recover from the removal of $@
@if test -f $@; then :; else \
trap 'rm -rf data.lock data.stamp 1 2 13 15; \
## mkdir is a portable test-and-set
