* Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:10:20PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:56:02PM CEST:
> >> Right. So why is:
> >>
> >> AMTAR = TAR_OPTIONS="$(TAR_OPTIONS)" ${SHELL}
> >> /home/behdad/src/git/fd.o/cairo/build/missing --run tar
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:31:29PM CEST:
>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:40:52PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> my-dist:
> env TAR_OPTIONS="--owner=0 --group=0" $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFL
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:56:02PM CEST:
>> Right. So why is:
>>
>> AMTAR = TAR_OPTIONS="$(TAR_OPTIONS)" ${SHELL}
>> /home/behdad/src/git/fd.o/cairo/build/missing --run tar
>>
>> not backward-compatible then?
>
> Because it breaks an external scrip
BTW, somebody was nice enough to let mails to bugs-automake (not the
bogus extra 's') find their way...
* Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:56:02PM CEST:
>
> Right. So why is:
>
> AMTAR = TAR_OPTIONS="$(TAR_OPTIONS)" ${SHELL}
> /home/behdad/src/git/fd.o/cairo/build/missing --run
* Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:31:29PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:40:52PM CEST:
> >> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>> my-dist:
> >>> env TAR_OPTIONS="--owner=0 --group=0" $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) dist
> >>
> >> Thanks
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:40:52PM CEST:
>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> my-dist:
>>> env TAR_OPTIONS="--owner=0 --group=0" $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) dist
>>
>> Thanks. Done now. Would be nice if automake did that already. Or at least
>> just
* Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:40:52PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > my-dist:
> > env TAR_OPTIONS="--owner=0 --group=0" $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) dist
>
>
> Thanks. Done now. Would be nice if automake did that already. Or at least
> just passed TAR_OPTIONS d
Hi Behdad,
unfortunately I'm still not fully through. I hate to send replies in
bits, but it's also bad if the delay is unnecessarily long. So here
we go with more bits:
* Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:14:46PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Fri,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Behdad,
>
> thank you for you helpful feedback! Addressing parts of it:
Hi,
Thanks again for the reply.
> * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:22:54AM CEST:
>> Also may be a good idea to instruct tar to not record uid of the user making
>> the tarball
Hi Behdad,
thank you for you helpful feedback! Addressing parts of it:
* Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:22:54AM CEST:
> Also may be a good idea to instruct tar to not record uid of the user making
> the tarball?
Is there any way of doing that portably? Otherwise, the only cho
Hi again,
We're finally getting that cairo snapshot out, so here's some rambling about
"make dist" improvements:
- Sticky bits:
We've had problems before that cairo tarballs have included files with sticky
bits set. So we added a rule ourselves to clean up of any stic
11 matches
Mail list logo