* Karl Berry wrote on Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:10:31AM CEST:
> The line numbers are probably off now since I made more
> changes since sending the message, but the essential point is that it
> complains about \
> #
> at the end of man1_MANS definition (it is not present below), but does
> not compla
There is no appendix to your message.
As usual :).
The line numbers are probably off now since I made more
changes since sending the message, but the essential point is that it
complains about \
#
at the end of man1_MANS definition (it is not present below), but does
not complain about the sa
Hi Karl,
* Karl Berry wrote on Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:09:15PM CEST:
> automake 1.10.2 complains about "comment after trailing backslash"
> sometimes, but not every time. In the appended Makefile.am, I get
> Makefile.am:23: comment following trailing backslash
> which is true enough, but there a
automake 1.10.2 complains about "comment after trailing backslash"
sometimes, but not every time. In the appended Makefile.am, I get
Makefile.am:23: comment following trailing backslash
which is true enough, but there are also comments after trailing
backslashes at line 124 and line 108. And if
