Good day, Ralf!
.pc.lo compiles but there is no tags rule being generated. With .pc.c
rule tags are ok.
So still there is a problem somewhere...
2011/1/11 Ralf Wildenhues :
> Hello Юрий,
>
> * Юрий Пухальский wrote on Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:48:08PM CET:
>> I've (finally) made it through two imp
Aye, looks like it.
I have no objections whatsoever, i just need some method to make it
work, because it's my working project:)
So no problem with me to join together these reports.
2011/1/12 Stefano Lattarini :
> Hello Юрий.
>
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Юрий Пухальский wrote:
>> So i put it
Hello Юрий.
On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Юрий Пухальский wrote:
> So i put it all together.
>
> If i have a Makefile like this:
> -
> SUFFIXES = .pc
>
> .pc.lo:
> cp $(srcdir)/$*.pc $(builddir)/$*.c
> $(LTCOMPILE) -c $(builddir)/$*.c
> rm -f $(build
So i put it all together.
If i have a Makefile like this:
-
SUFFIXES = .pc
.pc.lo:
cp $(srcdir)/$*.pc $(builddir)/$*.c
$(LTCOMPILE) -c $(builddir)/$*.c
rm -f $(builddir)/$*.c
noinst_PROGRAMS = 1 2
1_SOURCES = 1.pc
db_src = 1.pc
2_SOURCES = du
Hello Юрий,
* Юрий Пухальский wrote on Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:48:08PM CET:
> I've (finally) made it through two implicit rules, but i have a problem there.
>
> The makefile looks something like that:
>
>
> .SUFFIXES: .pc .lo .c
> .pc.c:
> cp $< $@
> .c.lo:
>
2011/1/11 Ralf Wildenhues :
> Hello Юрий,
>
> * Юрий Пухальский wrote on Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:48:08PM CET:
>> I've (finally) made it through two implicit rules, but i have a problem
>> there.
>>
>> The makefile looks something like that:
>>
>>
>> .SUFFIXES: .pc .lo .c
>
Good day, Ralf!
I've (finally) made it through two implicit rules, but i have a problem there.
The makefile looks something like that:
.SUFFIXES: .pc .lo .c
.pc.c:
cp $< $@
.c.lo:
cp $< $@
Given that i have no .c and no .lo befor
