bug#7670: About make implementations that don't chain implicit rules

2010-12-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 19 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:52:17PM CET: > > Currently, automake is quite smart in catching and taking into account > > possible chaining of implicit rules. > [...] > > > And here comes the problem. While the above exam

bug#7670: About make implementations that don't chain implicit rules

2010-12-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:52:17PM CET: > Currently, automake is quite smart in catching and taking into account > possible chaining of implicit rules. [...] > And here comes the problem. While the above example works correctly for > at least GNU make (tested with versio

bug#7670: About make implementations that don't chain implicit rules

2010-12-17 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Severity: wishlist Hello automakers. Currently, automake is quite smart in catching and taking into account possible chaining of implicit rules. Here is a quite extensive example: $ cat > Makefile.am <<'END' bin_PROGRAMS = foo foo_SOURCES = foo.e .e.d: (echo 'int main() {' && c