bug#44772: [br...@clisp.org: bug#44772: 2 test failures in automake 1.16.3]

2020-12-04 Thread Reuben Thomas via Bug reports for Automake
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 22:20, Karl Berry wrote: > You sent the proposed change in the bug report to Bruno, so I committed > it in your name. > Sorry, I didn't mean to say I had nothing to do with the contents of the patch, just that I didn't have anything to do with installing it. (And I wasn't a

bug#44772: [br...@clisp.org: bug#44772: 2 test failures in automake 1.16.3]

2020-12-04 Thread Karl Berry
You sent the proposed change in the bug report to Bruno, so I committed it in your name. changed from "C file newer than Vala file" to "C file not older than Vala file". Yeah. Sorry that I wrote the log words too quickly. If this change is documented elsewhere it might be worth notin

bug#44772: [br...@clisp.org: bug#44772: 2 test failures in automake 1.16.3]

2020-12-04 Thread Reuben Thomas via Bug reports for Automake
I just noticed while updating to look at something else that a version of my patch seems to have been applied, but with a misleading commit message. It has my name on it, commit 7581ec208. But I don't think I had anything to do with that commit! The commit log says: "reverse -newer test". But it

bug#44772: 2 test failures in automake 1.16.3

2020-11-27 Thread Karl Berry
FAIL: t/vala-headers.sh ... FAIL: t/vala-mix2.sh I pushed Reuben's change (as below). Hope it helps. I guess I'll optimistically close this bug, knowing you will reopen if it's not solved :) ... Thanks to both of you. --karl --- a/bin/automake.in +++ b/bin/automake.in @@ -5734,7 +5734

bug#44772: [br...@clisp.org: bug#44772: 2 test failures in automake 1.16.3]

2020-11-21 Thread Reuben Thomas via Bug reports for Automake
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 22:01, Karl Berry wrote: > > By the way, I don't think that find command (or the cp -p for that > matter) is excessively portable. But I guess we don't much care about > crufty systems for vala support. --thanks, karl. > They are both using only POSIX-2008 features; these

bug#44772: [br...@clisp.org: bug#44772: 2 test failures in automake 1.16.3]

2020-11-21 Thread Karl Berry
Thanks Reuben. line 5737 of automake.in would become: . "\t\@if test ! -f \$@ && test \$(srcdir) != \$(builddir) && test -n \"\$\$(find -L \$(srcdir)/$vala_file) -prune \! -newer \$(srcdir)/$c_file\"; then cp -p \$(srcdir)/$c_file $built_c_file; fi\n" Bruno, can you p

bug#44772: [br...@clisp.org: bug#44772: 2 test failures in automake 1.16.3]

2020-11-21 Thread Reuben Thomas via Bug reports for Automake
2, Karl Berry wrote: > Reuben - any chance you can look into this vala failure? > > It seems that, (only) in the make distcheck done inside the test, the .c > files are not remade from the .vala? > > Thanks, > Karl > > > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 22:25:55 +0100 > From

bug#44772: 2 test failures in automake 1.16.3

2020-11-20 Thread Bruno Haible
On a glibc system, I'm seeing 2 test failures in automake 1.16.3: $ ./configure --prefix=/arch/x86_64-linux-gnu/gnu-inst-automake/1.16.3 $ make $ make check ... FAIL: t/vala-headers.sh ... FAIL: t/vala-mix2.sh ... Find attached the log files (redacted for privacy reasons). vala and valac exist in