Stefano Lattarini skribis:
> On 12/30/2013 09:55 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>> [MEGA-SNIP]
>>
>> No; I’m asking because the tests specifically refer to /bin/rm.
>> What’s the reason?
>>
> Copying from my first reply:
>
> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Would it be possible to change these t
On 12/30/2013 09:55 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> [MEGA-SNIP]
>
> No; I’m asking because the tests specifically refer to /bin/rm.
> What’s the reason?
>
Copying from my first reply:
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Would it be possible to change these tests to use ‘rm’
> instead of /bin/rm?
Stefano Lattarini skribis:
> On 12/30/2013 04:44 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini skribis:
>>
>>> On 12/29/2013 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
However, in general, I think packages should not rely on hardcoded file
names, and instead use AC_PATH_PROG
On 12/30/2013 04:44 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini skribis:
>
>> On 12/29/2013 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> However, in general, I think packages should not rely on hardcoded file
>>> names, and instead use AC_PATH_PROG or similar mechanisms to get the
>>> ri
Stefano Lattarini skribis:
> On 12/29/2013 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> However, in general, I think packages should not rely on hardcoded file
>> names, and instead use AC_PATH_PROG or similar mechanisms to get the
>> right file name.
>>
> Not in this case. The test is a "spy" ch
tags 16291 notabug
close 16291
stop
On 12/29/2013 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
>
> While upgrading the GNU system to Automake 1.14.1, I noticed that a few
> tests emit warnings like this:
>
SKIPs are not warning, just informative messages explaining why some
tests couldn't be run.
>
Hello!
While upgrading the GNU system to Automake 1.14.1, I noticed that a few
tests emit warnings like this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
SKIP: t/spy-rm.tap 1 # SKIP /bin/rm not found
PASS: t/spy-rm.tap 2 - rm -f
SKIP: t/spy-rm.tap 3 # SKIP /bin/rm not found
