On 06/12/2013 06:47 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeff. Thanks for the report, but I don't think there is a real
>> bug here.
>
> Short version: yes, you're right; with your suggestion, I did more
> testing (via "make distc
On Jun 12, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> Hi Jeff. Thanks for the report, but I don't think there is a real
> bug here.
Short version: yes, you're right; with your suggestion, I did more testing (via
"make distcheck" rather than checking for "depmod" in the Makefile.in) and
fou
tags 14594 notabug
close 1459
stop
Hi Jeff. Thanks for the report, but I don't think there is a real
bug here.
On 06/12/2013 01:42 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Attached is a trivial reproducer showing that Automake is not including
> depcomp
> in the generated Makefile.in, which therefo
Attached is a trivial reproducer showing that Automake is not including depcomp
in the generated Makefile.in, which therefore results in a "make dist" tarball
being un-buildable. I have tested with Automake 1.13.3, which I just
downloaded from ftp.gnu.org and built myself (paired with Autoconf
