On 2013-05-29 16:18, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Yeah, let's got for this (with a comment like "zap carriage-return characters,
> for MinGW/MSYS" ;-). No need to over-complicate stuff. If in a few days I'll
> still be convinced that it's worth making this conditional to MinGW, I'll do
> that mysel
On 05/29/2013 03:39 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2013-05-29 10:57, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> On 05/29/2013 01:43 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I have this interesting log snippet from a failed run of t/cxx-demo.sh
>>> on the master branch (commit baf8a1c22acce0908):
>>>
>> And as you note
On 2013-05-29 10:57, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 05/29/2013 01:43 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have this interesting log snippet from a failed run of t/cxx-demo.sh
>> on the master branch (commit baf8a1c22acce0908):
>>
> And as you noted in your follow-up message, the problem is the same
On 05/29/2013 01:43 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have this interesting log snippet from a failed run of t/cxx-demo.sh
> on the master branch (commit baf8a1c22acce0908):
>
And as you noted in your follow-up message, the problem is the same on
the micro branch (87e49f4f040c8ab))
>
> + for p
On 2013-05-29 01:43, Peter Rosin wrote:
> This is on MSYS, and I strongly suspect a line ending discrepancy.
> The output from ./play is likely to have CRNL line endings, while
> exp.play is likely to have NL line endings. diff then barfs.
The problem is the same on the micro branch (87e49f4f040c8
Hi!
I have this interesting log snippet from a failed run of t/cxx-demo.sh
on the master branch (commit baf8a1c22acce0908):
+ for p in play work
+ ./play
+ cat exp.play
We are playing :-)
Howdy, play!
+ cat got.play
We are playing :-)
Howdy, play!
+ diff exp.play got.play
1,2c1,2
< We are playin
