bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-03-05 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2013-03-05 14:43 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important > enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If > someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it. FWIW I tried to setup a DOS/DJGPP environment for testi

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-03-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 13435 + moreinfo patch thanks On 03/05/2013 08:43 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important > enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If > someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it. > OK. I just find it

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-03-05 Thread DJ Delorie
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it. Thanks!

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-03-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 02/03/2013 09:33 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Reference: > > On 01/28/2013 02:55 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> On 01/23/2013 01:16 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> >>> I've pushed my attempt to the public rewindable branch >>> 'experimental

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-02-03 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Reference: On 01/28/2013 02:55 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 01/23/2013 01:16 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> On 01/14/2013 11:29 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: >>> >>> Stefano Lattarini wrote: Well, then it appear we might actually have no

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-01-28 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 01/23/2013 01:16 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Reference: > > > On 01/14/2013 11:29 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: >> >> Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> >>> Well, then it appear we might actually have no problems in keeping DJGPP >>> support. If the ne

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-01-23 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Reference: On 01/14/2013 11:29 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> >> Well, then it appear we might actually have no problems in keeping DJGPP >> support. If the new code with split info files disabled works as expected, >> re

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-01-14 Thread DJ Delorie
> I also forgot to ask a rather important question: does modern DJGPP > on Windows 2000/XP/7 etc. support file names starting with a dot? Just tested djgpp 2.04 with bash 2.05 on windows 7, and it can create files with a leading dot.

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-01-14 Thread DJ Delorie
Ok, thanks!

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-01-14 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 01/14/2013 10:38 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: >> I also forgot to ask a rather important question: does modern DJGPP >> on Windows 2000/XP/7 etc. support file names starting with a dot? > > Just tested djgpp 2.04 with bash 2.05 on windows 7, and it can create > files with a leading dot. > Well, then i

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-01-14 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 01/14/2013 01:23 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Severity: wishlist > > Reference: > > > I'm moving this discussion to bug-automake, so that is will be registered > in our bug tracker, for easier future reference. > > On 01/13/

bug#13435: Please don't kill DJGPP support...

2013-01-14 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Severity: wishlist Reference: I'm moving this discussion to bug-automake, so that is will be registered in our bug tracker, for easier future reference. On 01/13/2013 08:22 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > The DJGPP project is still quite