tags 11863 - moreinfo
thanks
On 07/05/2012 08:19 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Reuben,
>
> On 5 Jul 2012, at 05:39, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> On 4 July 2012 23:35, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> tags 11863 + moreinfo
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> On 07/04/2012 10:43 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
I have a lib
On 5 July 2012 07:19, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> Currently the best way to tell Automake to only build a libtool library
> for `make check' without installing it, but at the same time to tell libtool
> not to make a convenience archive is:
>
> check_LTLIBRARIES += tests/libalientest.la
>
> tes
Hi Reuben,
On 5 Jul 2012, at 05:39, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 4 July 2012 23:35, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> tags 11863 + moreinfo
>> thanks
>>
>> On 07/04/2012 10:43 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>>> I have a library that I want to build just for tests. Hence, I add it
>>> to check_LTLIBRARIES. It's
On 4 July 2012 23:35, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> tags 11863 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On 07/04/2012 10:43 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> I have a library that I want to build just for tests. Hence, I add it
>> to check_LTLIBRARIES. It's a plugin, so I want the .so (or .dll or
>> whatever) to be built,
tags 11863 + moreinfo
thanks
On 07/04/2012 10:43 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> I have a library that I want to build just for tests. Hence, I add it
> to check_LTLIBRARIES. It's a plugin, so I want the .so (or .dll or
> whatever) to be built, but it isn't!
>
It isn't built when you run "make check"?
I have a library that I want to build just for tests. Hence, I add it
to check_LTLIBRARIES. It's a plugin, so I want the .so (or .dll or
whatever) to be built, but it isn't!
If I instead add the library to pkglib_LTLIBRARIES, then the shared
object is built, but the test library is installed, whic
