Thank you for your efforts.
Even if it didn't solve the problem I know at least know where to look now.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Stefano Lattarini <
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> tags 10671 - moreinfo
> tags 10671 + notabug
> close 10671
> thanks
>
> On 02/07/2012 09:39 PM, Matthew
tags 10671 - moreinfo
tags 10671 + notabug
close 10671
thanks
On 02/07/2012 09:39 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> The script prints the following to the console:
>
> + mkdir am.dir
> + cd am.dir
> + cat
> + echo 'int bar () { return 0; }'
> + mkdir sub
> + echo 'choke me'
> + st=0
> + gcc -I. -I./s
The script prints the following to the console:
+ mkdir am.dir
+ cd am.dir
+ cat
+ echo 'int bar () { return 0; }'
+ mkdir sub
+ echo 'choke me'
+ st=0
+ gcc -I. -I./sub -c -o foo.o foo.c
In file included from foo.c:1:
./sub/bar.h:1: error: expected `=', `,', `;', `asm' or `__attribute__'
before `
Hi Matthew, sorry for the delay.
On 02/01/2012 06:53 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> All bits may have been accidentally set when I scp'ed stdinc.dir to my
> Windows machine for inspection.
> I sent the .tar from it.
>
> I believe the SELinux is installed by default on CentOS 6.2 and I didn't
> cha
On 02/01/2012 10:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> I thought you read the libtool lists and also assumed Matthew would
> get back with the info from the other list, so I didn't speak up.
> Anyway, have a look at this libttol bug:
> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10672
>
Thanks for the poi
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-01 09:49:
> On 01/31/2012 09:15 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
>> The OS is CentOS 6.2 x86_64
>> Kernel Version: 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64
>> GCC Version: 4.4.6
>> Autconf Version: 2.68
>> Libtool Version: 2.4
>>
>> The stdinc.dir and stdinc.log are attached as a .tar.
On 01/31/2012 09:15 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> The OS is CentOS 6.2 x86_64
> Kernel Version: 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64
> GCC Version: 4.4.6
> Autconf Version: 2.68
> Libtool Version: 2.4
>
> The stdinc.dir and stdinc.log are attached as a .tar.
>
Thanks. However, I still cannot reproduce the p
[Re-adding the list in CC:]
[Please don't drop it in future replies. Thanks.]
On 01/31/2012 07:46 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> I ran the test three more times.
> All runs failed.
> I have attached the logs.
>
> Do you need any more information about the specific system set-up I'm using?
>
Yes,
tags 10671 + moreinfo
severity 10671 minor
thanks
Hi Matthew, thanks for the report.
On 01/31/2012 03:47 AM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> Bug encountered in Automake 1.11 Test Suite run.
>
Consider that 1.11 is already some years old, and, most importantly,
suffers from a know security vulnerability
