Re: automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-06-30 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Dagobert, * Dagobert Michelsen wrote on Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:56:02AM CEST: > have you given this some more thought? Would you consider it safe > to release automake 1.11 on Solaris even with the failed tests? Yes, I would. IIRC we fixed all but one test failure (vala4.test) in the git t

Re: automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-06-30 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Ralf, have you given this some more thought? Would you consider it safe to release automake 1.11 on Solaris even with the failed tests? Best regards -- Dago Am 25.05.2009 um 10:20 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: Hi Ralf, Am 24.05.2009 um 14:52 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: Well, it seems all

Re: automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-06-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Dagobert Michelsen wrote on Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:20:49AM CEST: > Am 24.05.2009 um 14:52 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: >> Well, it seems all remaining failures in the newer log look like this >> | configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH >> | See `config.log' for more details. >> |

Re: automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-05-25 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Ralf, Am 24.05.2009 um 14:52 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: Well, it seems all remaining failures in the newer log look like this | checking for gcc... no | checking for cc... no | checking for cl.exe... no | configure: error: in `/export/home/dam/mgar/pkg/automake/trunk/ work/build-isa-i386/auto

Re: automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-05-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Dagobert, * Dagobert Michelsen wrote on Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:44:04PM CEST: > Am 18.05.2009 um 23:10 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: >>> FAIL: insthook.test >> >> The insthook.test failure looks like you have some variables like >> $bindir or $exec_prefix or $prefix set in your environment. Is t

Re: automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-05-19 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Ralf, Am 18.05.2009 um 23:10 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: FAIL: insthook.test The insthook.test failure looks like you have some variables like $bindir or $exec_prefix or $prefix set in your environment. Is that the case? Maybe you can look over your environment for other possibly problematic

Re: automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-05-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Dagobert, [ quoting your message slightly out of order ] * Dagobert Michelsen wrote on Mon, May 18, 2009 at 06:16:15PM CEST: > I have 15 failed tests for automake 1.11 on Solaris 10 x86 with the > Sun Studio compiler: > Please see the detailed log at >

automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-05-18 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi, I have 15 failed tests for automake 1.11 on Solaris 10 x86 with the Sun Studio compiler: XFAIL: all.test XFAIL: auxdir2.test XFAIL: cond17.test FAIL: depcomp7.test FAIL: instdir-ltlib.test FAIL: instfail-libtool.test FAIL: insthook.test FAIL: libtool5.test FAIL: libtool6.test FAIL: libtool8.