* Karl Berry wrote on Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:46:40PM CET:
> Erm, the --rmsymlink and --delete options work on all remaining files up
> to the net --rmsymlink, --delete, or -- option. So that -- really needs
> to be there. Or we need to change the semantics of these optinos.
>
> Ok,
Erm, the --rmsymlink and --delete options work on all remaining files up
to the net --rmsymlink, --delete, or -- option. So that -- really needs
to be there. Or we need to change the semantics of these optinos.
Ok, my mistake. I think that should be pointed out explicitly.
(See belo
Hi Karl,
I agree with most everything you wrote (and I elided now).
* Karl Berry wrote on Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:06:55AM CET:
> I altered the last example to be about a mistaken upload, instead of
> retiring an existing release. In general, it seems to me that we don't
> want to suggest that it
Sure. These numbers were real Automake versions though,
I know.
want to genericize the package name as well?
Yep, that's what I meant to suggest.
--symlink also allows you to pass target names other than
*-latest.tar.gz I guess, so #2 shows how --symlink-regex works while
Hi Karl,
* Karl Berry wrote on Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:25:37PM CET:
> First, all the existing examples in gnupload --help use automake 1.8.2b.
> This isn't either of rms' recommended version number schemes for test
> releases. Would you agree to changing to something generic, like
> foobar-0.9.90
