king for gcc
configure:2578: found /usr/bin/gcc
configure:2589: result: gcc
configure:2818: checking for C compiler version
configure:2827: gcc --version >&5
Best regards
Petr
On 04/23/2013 10:45 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 04/22/2013 03:55 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hi Peter, tha
@localhost: ~/mycproject$
On 04/20/2013 08:50 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
tags 13588 + patch
stop
[+cc automake-patches]
Hi Jack, Petr, sorry for the ludicrous delay.
On 03/22/2013 02:39 AM, Jack Kelly wrote:
Petr Hracek writes:
Hello Jack and Stefano,
Bellow is corrected patch for automake.
Hello Jack and Stefano,
Bellow is corrected patch for automake.
Jack thank you for corrections. Now the patch looks like better.
From 98a64a309a0f7271d2772dd63e45e43b1163c315 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Hracek
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:27:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] maint: pax hangs in
ches
around here.
Stefano: is this the sort of thing that should have
AC_MSG_CHECKING/AC_MSG_RESULT pairs? Also, have I got the m4 quoting
right?
-- Jack
Petr Hracek writes:
Hello Stefano,
diff --git a/m4/tar.m4 b/m4/tar.m4
index ec8c83e..87477f1 100644
--- a/m4/tar.m4
+++ b/m4/tar.m4
@@
Hello Stefano,
one more time. wrong patch file name.
[stone@kiasportyw automake(master)]$ cat
0001-maint-pax-hangs-in-case-big-UID.patch
From af7d2d01b363914ce22628dae06f87065649d402 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Hracek
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:41:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] maint: pax
tion
work easier to us, you can present the patch as the output of
"git format-patch" rather than of "git diff", and add a clear
git commit message that explains the rationale and motivation
for the change. That would be appreciated.
On 02/05/2013 01:42 PM, Petr Hracek wrote:
ed it.
I apologize if my comments have been seen as a full review
and caused this patch to be left in limbo. That was not my
intention, but I should have stated it explicitly from the
beginning.
Cheers,
Peter
--
S pozdravem / Best regards
Petr Hracek
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
BaseOS Core S
Hello Peter,
just a one question regarding that problem
Can that patch applicable?
Did you observe any problems on other platforms?
Thank you in advance
Best regards
Petr
On 01/30/2013 03:47 PM, Petr Hracek wrote:
On 01/30/2013 02:45 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi Petr,
I have looked at this
On 01/30/2013 02:45 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi Petr,
I have looked at this only cursory, but FWIW,
On 2013-01-30 14:31, Petr Hracek wrote:
*snip*
+AC_SUBST([AM_BIG_ID], [2097152])
*snip*
+#Test if $user_id is greater then 2^21
s/then/than/
And please add a space after the comment
AC_MSG_WARN([id -u command was not found and check to id is
suppressed])
+fi
+ fi
+fi
AC_CACHE_VAL([am_cv_prog_tar_$1], [am_cv_prog_tar_$1=$_am_tool])
AC_MSG_RESULT([$am_cv_prog_tar_$1])])
Please check and incorporate them if you agree.
--
S pozdravem / Best regards
Petr Hracek
--
S pozdravem / Best regards
Petr Hracek
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
BaseOS Core Services Brno
Email: phra...@redhat.com
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
