Re: automake-1.11 test failure on darwin9 - instmany-python.test

2009-05-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Matthias, Peter, > > * Matthias Klose wrote on Thu, May 21, 2009 at 08:11:49AM CEST: >> Peter O'Gorman schrieb: >>> This patch works for me. Thoughts? > >>> 2009-??-?? Peter O'Gorman >>> m4/p

Re: automake-1.11 test failure on darwin9 - instmany-python.test

2009-05-20 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Peter, > > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:01:49PM CEST: >> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:43:00AM CEST: >>>> The instmany-python test is failing for me on Ma

Re: automake-1.11 test failure on darwin9 - instmany-python.test

2009-05-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
*) am_cv_python_pythondir="$PYTHON_PREFIX/lib/python$PYTHON_VERSION/site-packages" ;; esac ;; ? Also, I didn't see you in AUTHORS, you should correct that :) Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com

Re: automake-1.11 test failure on darwin9 - instmany-python.test

2009-05-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Peter, > > thanks for the bug report. > > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:43:00AM CEST: >> The instmany-python test is failing for me on Mac OS X 10.5.7. Looks >> like it is trying to install things into /Library

Re: use 'jot' if available

2009-05-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Peter, > > thanks for the bug report; will address in a separate message. For now: > > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:43:00AM CEST: >> Also, I wonder if it is worth checking for bsd''s 'jot' utility in

Re: bug in m4/mkdirp.m4 *PING*

2005-08-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Could someone look at <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2005-07/msg00141.html> please. Really would appreciate this... Thanks, Peter

Re: bug in m4/mkdirp.m4 *PING*

2005-08-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Could someone look at please. Peter

Re: bug in m4/mkdirp.m4

2005-07-28 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Hi, If install-sh loses its execute bit, it is usually okay, install-sh is usually called as "$(SHELL) $(install_sh)" except that mkdir_p is set to "$(install_sh) -d" on some systems. I suggest the attached patch. Actually, it turns out tha

bug in m4/mkdirp.m4

2005-07-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, If install-sh loses its execute bit, it is usually okay, install-sh is usually called as "$(SHELL) $(install_sh)" except that mkdir_p is set to "$(install_sh) -d" on some systems. I suggest the attached patch. Peter Index: m4/mkdirp.m4 ==

Re: mdate-sh broken on darwin

2005-02-08 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Stepan> case $3 in Stepan> ???*) day=$1;; Stepan> *) day=$3; shift;; Stepan> esac I think so. Can any of you make sure this still work on Darwin? Works for me. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com