bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

2013/5/1 Stefano Lattarini : > On 04/28/2013 09:39 AM, Joshua C. wrote: >> 2013/4/27 Stefano Lattarini : >>>> Thanks for the promp solution! About the other part: >>>> What works for me is adding 'LIBTOOL=@LIBTOOL@ --tag=CC', which I >>>> fou

bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

2013/4/27 Stefano Lattarini : >> Thanks for the promp solution! About the other part: >> What works for me is adding 'LIBTOOL=@LIBTOOL@ --tag=CC', which I >> found on the internet. Can you reproduce this at your side? >> > Actually, I cannot even reproduce the failure at my side. Which version > o

bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

2013/4/26 Stefano Lattarini : > On 04/26/2013 03:22 PM, Joshua C. wrote: >> >> It looks like you nailed this down! I couldn't fail the test in 10 >> consecutive runs. I'll say this patch fixed it. >> > Good! I will push the patch shortly. I'm not clos

bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

2013/4/26 Stefano Lattarini : > On 04/26/2013 12:57 PM, Joshua C. wrote: >> 2013/4/25 Stefano Lattarini : >>> On 04/20/2013 10:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>>> Reference: >>>> <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13832> >>

bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

2013/4/25 Stefano Lattarini : > On 04/20/2013 10:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> Reference: >> >> >> Hi Joshua, sorry again for the shameful delay. >> >> Can you check whether the attached patch solves the failure you've been >> experiencing w

bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

2013/3/6 Joshua C. > > > 2013/3/5 Stefano Lattarini : > > > tags 13832 + moreinfo > > severity 13832 minor > > stop > > > > Hi Joshua, sorry for the delay. > > Don't worry, I'm glad that I got a response, because sometimes some > mai