On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> El 15/4/25 a las 14:52, Eric Blake escribió:
> > I'm not sure the exact process Debian uses to do downstream builds,
> > but my guess is that it involves a downstream git repository for their
> > patches to be applied on top of the up
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 04:15:49PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote:
> since unpacking the tarball in different months may inadverently
> result in two environments with different dates on the file
>
> It could? Shouldn't the mtime in the tarball be preserved when
> unpacking, on any reasonable sys
[dropping gnulib, but adding automake, for the reproducibility issue]
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 06:04:53PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> El 14/4/25 a las 16:36, Eric Blake escribió:
> > Also, I see two
> > uses of @value{UPDATED} in m4.texi, but your patch only removed one;
> > is the other one not
