Re: LTLIBOBJS not built when using AC_REPLACE_FUNCS without AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR

2008-12-29 Thread Chris Pickett
lib/ subdir and a libcompat (with an eye towards Gnulib). Is there a better way to write this, besides commoning up @GCOV_LIBS@ in a single LIBADD = @GCOV_LIBS@ line? * Chris Pickett wrote on Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 07:31:22AM CET: In tracking this down, I found out that neither @LTLIBOBJS@ no

Re: LTLIBOBJS not built when using AC_REPLACE_FUNCS without AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR

2008-12-27 Thread Chris Pickett
Chris Pickett wrote: In tracking this down, I found out that neither @LTLIBOBJS@ nor @LTALLOCA@ are mentioned in either the "Linking the Program" manual section or the "Program and Library Variables" section in the paragraphs talking about _DEPENDENCIES, although @LIBOB

Re: LTLIBOBJS not built when using AC_REPLACE_FUNCS without AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR

2008-12-27 Thread Chris Pickett
Hi Ralf, It turns out that I can fix my problem by adding @LTLIBOBJS@ to libcheck_la_DEPENDENCIES, which is something I set explicitly but neglected to mention earlier. Ralf Wildenhues wrote: mkdir src cat >configure.ac <<\END AC_INIT(a,1) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(foreign) AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile s

LTLIBOBJS not built when using AC_REPLACE_FUNCS without AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR

2008-12-22 Thread Chris Pickett
Hi, I'm trying to use AC_REPLACE_FUNCS to provide strsignal. However, when I run make it doesn't build a strsignal.lo for me, and libtool complains "link: `strsignal.lo' is not a valid libtool object". This is using the latest versions of the Autotools on MinGW/MSYS. The Automake manual sa

Re: need to set ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS along with AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR

2008-03-21 Thread Chris Pickett
Eric Blake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Chris Pickett on 3/21/2008 10:58 AM: | Hi, Hi Chris, and adding bug-automake, | | I had AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) in configure.ac and a macro from the | archive in m4/ that wasn't getting m4_include'd at

Re: RFE: support per-program noinst_HEADERS

2008-03-13 Thread Chris Pickett
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Chris Pickett wrote on Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:50:36PM CET: I still don't know what the "if PROG1" stuff is about (I don't want these test programs to exist conditionally), Well, if you don't want them only conditionally, then just don&#

Re: RFE: support per-program noinst_HEADERS

2008-03-12 Thread Chris Pickett
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Oh, ok. Like this? if PROG1 prog1_headers = ... else prog1_headers = endif ... noinst_HEADERS = $(prog1_headers) ... IOW: just rename all *_HEADERS to *_headers, that way automake will ignore them. And list all *_headers in noinst_HEADERS. s/HEADERS/headers/ and addi

Re: RFE: support per-program noinst_HEADERS

2008-03-12 Thread Chris Pickett
Chris Pickett wrote: My main test Makefile.am is here: http://svn.sable.mcgill.ca/sable/spmt/libspmt/tests/Makefile.am https://svn.sable.mcgill.ca/sable/spmt/libspmt/tests/Makefile.am and you can see my (awful) generated code here: http://svn.sable.mcgill.ca/sable/spmt/libspmt/tests

Re: RFE: support per-program noinst_HEADERS

2008-03-12 Thread Chris Pickett
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Chris Pickett wrote on Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:10:41PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Chris Pickett wrote on Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 07:50:46PM CET: I would like to be able to use noinst_prog_HEADERS, but with 1.10.1 I get a complaint about noinst_progdir not being

Re: RFE: support per-program noinst_HEADERS

2008-03-12 Thread Chris Pickett
Hi Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Chris, * Chris Pickett wrote on Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 07:50:46PM CET: I would like to be able to use noinst_prog_HEADERS, but with 1.10.1 I get a complaint about noinst_progdir not being defined: You can just put all your not-to-be installed headers into

RFE: support per-program noinst_HEADERS

2008-03-12 Thread Chris Pickett
Hi, (Please CC me in any reply, I am not subscribed.) I would like to be able to use noinst_prog_HEADERS, but with 1.10.1 I get a complaint about noinst_progdir not being defined: `noinst_prog_HEADERS' is used but `noinst_progdir' is undefined I can work around this like this: noinst_progdi

Re: [Fwd: autoreconf and aclocal options (-I, --ac-dir)]

2006-04-04 Thread Chris Pickett
On Mon, April 3, 2006 4:57 am, Stepan Kasal wrote: > you are using system-wide Automake together with *.m4 files from packages > installed locally (under your home directory). > > You cannot modify the system-wide dirlist file, so you decided to modify > the top Makefile.am of every package. Well