bug#68860: race condition with make recheck

2024-08-26 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Karl Berry , 2024-08-25 19:17: > - $output_rules .= "check-am: all-am\n"; > + $output_rules .= "check-am: all-am"; > if (@check) > { > - pretty_print_rule ("\t\$(MAKE) \$(AM_MAKEFLAGS)", "\t ", @check); > + $output_

bug#68860: race condition with make recheck

2024-08-25 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Karl Berry , 2024-08-25 10:45: Thanks much, Bogdan. -recheck: all %CHECK_DEPS% +recheck: all-am %CHECK_DEPS% Do you have a grip on all-am? Looking at handle_all in bin/automake, I admit I remain baffled as to what all those pieces of all-am are, and why it's done as it is. Te be h

bug#68860: race condition with make recheck

2024-08-23 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Hi. I've just noticed that bug #68860 (patched) may be a duplicate of #26471. Different descriptions and error messages, but looks like the same cause. -- Regards - Bogdan ('bogdro') D. (GNU/Linux & FreeDOS) X86 assembly (DOS, GNU/Linux):http://bogdro.evai.pl/index-en.php Sof

bug#69908: [PATCH] Fix for no-dist-built-sources

2024-08-22 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Hello. Thank you for reporting the issue. I believe I have fixed the defect. The attached patch assumes that "no-dist-built-sources" is the right option name, following the documentation and the Options.pm file. Automake itself has been changed to process the option correctly, distdir.am got th

bug#68860: race condition with make recheck

2024-08-16 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Hello. Thank you for reporting the issue. The attached patch should fix the problem. It may be a bit of an overkill, perhaps just one of the fixes would suffice, but it seems to work at least. I've re-made your useful script into an Automake test. Since non-deterministic defects may be hard to

bug#68179: Re: automake-1.16j on OpenBSD

2024-02-22 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Bruno Haible , 2024-02-20 12:44: Bogdan wrote: Right. And, as I suspected, nothing in any LIBS, LD*, no libobjc found. Does it work if you put AC_LANG([Objective C]) somewhere between the lines cat >> configure.ac << 'END' and the first END following it (i.e., in t

bug#68179: Re: automake-1.16j on OpenBSD

2024-02-19 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Bruno Haible , 2024-02-19 01:44: Hello Bogdan, Can you tell us what actually "c++" is on your system? Like e.g. run "c++ --version" or "c++ --help"? $ c++ --version OpenBSD clang version 13.0.0 Target: amd64-unknown-openbsd7.4 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin On my system, A

bug#68179: Re: automake-1.16j on OpenBSD

2024-02-19 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Bruno Haible , 2024-02-19 01:33: Hello Bogdan, Thank you for dealing with the Automake support. Thank you for testing :) 2) t/strip2 - could you check if you have the STRIPPROG environment variable set and, if yes, unset it (or, at least, remove the "--verbose" parameter from it) prior to

bug#68179: Re: automake-1.16j on OpenBSD

2024-02-18 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Hello, Bruno. Thank you for your testing. About your defect: 1) t/objcxx-* - may need our attention, 2) t/strip2 - could you check if you have the STRIPPROG environment variable set and, if yes, unset it (or, at least, remove the "--verbose" parameter from it) prior to running the test? 3) t/yacc

bug#68179: Re: automake-1.16j on OpenBSD

2024-02-13 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Hello, Bruno. Thank you for your testing. About your defect: 1) t/objcxx-* - may need our attention, 2) t/strip2 - could you check if you have the STRIPPROG environment variable set and, if yes, unset it (or, at least, remove the "--verbose" parameter from it) prior to running the test? 3) t/yacc

bug#68832: [PATCH] Testing: POSIX yacc and C++ linkage

2024-02-06 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Hi. I have access to just Linux and SunOS and cannot reproduce the error (the tests pass), but Karl's solution seems reasonable and shouldn't hurt. Attaching a simple patch which (hopefully) fixes the issue. At least, it doesn't hurt Linux or SunOS, so it shouldn't make things worse. Feel free

bug#68119: [GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed

2024-01-28 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Hello. The attached patch fixes the tests for Python 3.12 (and, hopefully later ones), while still keeping them working for earlier versions. A simple fix. Could perhaps be written better (like in a single Python script), but this is enough. -- Regards - Bogdan ('bogdro') D. (G

bug#54020: Allow user-defined libtool options

2024-01-18 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Mike Frysinger , 2024-01-17 06:04: On 14 Jan 2024 18:55, Bogdan wrote: Mike Frysinger , 2024-01-14 02:06: On 13 Jan 2024 22:29, Bogdan wrote: Mike Frysinger , 2024-01-13 07:19: On 15 Mar 2023 17:31, Bogdan wrote: Another patch from my side. This one makes it possible for users to pass a

bug#54020: Allow user-defined libtool options

2024-01-14 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Mike Frysinger , 2024-01-14 02:06: On 13 Jan 2024 22:29, Bogdan wrote: Mike Frysinger , 2024-01-13 07:19: On 15 Mar 2023 17:31, Bogdan wrote: Another patch from my side. This one makes it possible for users to pass additional options to libtool in 'compile' mode. Fixes #54020. Added d

bug#54020: Allow user-defined libtool options

2024-01-13 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Mike Frysinger , 2024-01-13 07:19: On 15 Mar 2023 17:31, Bogdan wrote: Another patch from my side. This one makes it possible for users to pass additional options to libtool in 'compile' mode. Fixes #54020. Added documentation and a test case including the '-no-suppress' option. All tests

bug#8362: make install prefix inserted in source code with generated python files

2024-01-13 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Mike Frysinger , 2024-01-13 07:26: On 21 Mar 2023 23:05, Bogdan wrote: Third, and most important (I think) is that we need to note that "prog/x.py" is GENERATED, but is NOT marked so. Adding BUILT_SOURCES = prog/x.py i don't think this is a correct use of BUILT_SOURCES. https://www

bug#64837: [bug#54412] [bug#64837] Fix Python on Debian

2024-01-09 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Hello. Referring to the discussion related to the upcoming release, I confirm defect #64837 on Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) and I confirm that the last patch in #54412 (the one attached in the defect in Message#14 - https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=54412#14, not the one inlined) f

bug#68141: automake-1.16j on Ubuntu

2024-01-01 Thread Bogdan via Bug reports for Automake
Karl Berry , 2023-12-31 00:37: FAIL: t/python-prefix Log file is attached. I think it is the same issue as reported at https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64837 . Thanks for the report. I hope Mike or Bogdan can look at it. I have trouble discerning fixes for anyt