Re: dependence on threads.pm?

2008-11-06 Thread Ben Pfaff
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Looks like my try at optional use of threads.pm does not work. > 'use' seems to be evaluated even in false branches. Yes, that will happen. I think that you should be able to use "require" instead of "use" to avoid this behavior. Take a look at the

Re: Incorrect information in the manual about the tar-v7 option

2008-09-17 Thread Ben Pfaff
rmat. See: [...] > Should autotools add even more workarounds, or should rather > simply BusyBox be fixed? If only old versions of BusyBox do not support v7 tar format, as Vincent implies, then BusyBox has already been fixed, and Nokia just needs to upgrade to a current version. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org

Re: -local vs. -hook?

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Pfaff
ord it as: "...; hooks are always executed after the main rule's work is done." -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org

Re: Alternative Approach to Subdirectories issue

2007-07-20 Thread Ben Pfaff
ectory of the source file. For instance, if the source file is `subdir/file.cxx', then the output file would be `subdir/file.o'. In order to use this option with C sources, you should add `AM_PROG_CC_C_O' to `configure.ac'. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org

Re: Maintainer checks for non-c89 constructs?

2007-06-09 Thread Ben Pfaff
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $1" AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM(,)], [pspp_cv_name[]=yes], [pspp_cv_name[]=no]) CFLAGS="$pspp_save_CFLAGS"]) if test $pspp_cv_name = yes; then CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $1" fi ]) PSPP_ENABLE_OPTION(-Wdeclaration-after-statement) -- Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]