the three patches from the preceding mail are ready to commit.
Thanks very much for all your work (and explanations) on this, Bruno.
Committed. -k
Kirill Makurin wrote:
> The installer from https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/ is the same as
> found in https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/ (except for possible
> difference in versions) and the Wikipedia article points to the former
> website (mingw.org website is no longer alive). This installe
I tested updated patches and they work for both Msys2 and *MinGW*. For
completeness, I also tried using it from Cygwin and it works as expected.
From: bug-automake-bounces+maiddaisuki=outlook@gnu.org
on behalf of Bruno
Haible via Bug reports for Automake
Se
The installer from https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/ is the same as found in
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/ (except for possible difference in
versions) and the Wikipedia article points to the former website (mingw.org
website is no longer alive). This installer provides both `mingw-*` (
Kirill Makurin wrote:
> I applied patches and they work for Msys2.
>
> I also tested it with (what I assume is) "Msys-based MinGW"
> (https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/) and it fails. Its `uname -s` reports
> `MINGW32_NT-6.2` and it has `MSYSTEM` set , and it lacks `cygpath`.
> ...
> I explicitly
I applied patches and they work for Msys2.
I also tested it with (what I assume is) "Msys-based MinGW"
(https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/) and it fails. Its `uname -s` reports
`MINGW32_NT-6.2` and it has `MSYSTEM` set , and it lacks `cygpath`.
Should we even distinguish between "original MinGW"
