On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 22:26, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>
> Happy to look into it.
>
I have looked into it and attach a trivial patch, which works nicely.
It's not obvious to me whether any documentation is required; I rather
expected that these variables would behave like others (CC, CXX etc.). I've
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 22:20, Karl Berry wrote:
> You sent the proposed change in the bug report to Bruno, so I committed
> it in your name.
>
Sorry, I didn't mean to say I had nothing to do with the contents of the
patch, just that I didn't have anything to do with installing it. (And I
wasn't a
You sent the proposed change in the bug report to Bruno, so I committed
it in your name.
changed from "C file newer than Vala file" to "C file not older than
Vala file".
Yeah. Sorry that I wrote the log words too quickly.
If this change is documented elsewhere it might be worth notin
I just noticed while updating to look at something else that a version of
my patch seems to have been applied, but with a misleading commit message.
It has my name on it, commit 7581ec208. But I don't think I had anything to
do with that commit!
The commit log says: "reverse -newer test". But it
