On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 22:17, Karl Berry wrote:
> Hi Reuben,
>
> There doesn't seem to be a way for the user to configure a different
> ctags program
>
> I don't know of anything to the contrary. So ... would you be up for
> making a patch to support it :)? Etags too, I guess? At least the
Hi Reuben,
There doesn't seem to be a way for the user to configure a different
ctags program
I don't know of anything to the contrary. So ... would you be up for
making a patch to support it :)? Etags too, I guess? At least they seem
to be treated in the same way. --thanks, karl.
Either source files like this, which lie outside the subtree of the
current Makefile.am, should either be documented as frowned upon, or
they must be treated correctly. To be treated correctly, IMHO they
must avoid breaking the distcheck target.
I agree. I added a caveat to the ma
