On 01/03/2015 12:23 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hi Eric.
On 01/03/2015 12:14 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/02/2015 11:49 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
... even when a source file is specified as '$(srdir)/foo.c' or
'$(top_srcdir)/bar.c'. And ditto for dependency-tracking makefile
fragments (thos
Hi Eric.
On 01/03/2015 12:14 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/02/2015 11:49 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
... even when a source file is specified as '$(srdir)/foo.c' or
'$(top_srcdir)/bar.c'. And ditto for dependency-tracking makefile
fragments (those under '.deps' directories).
+++ b/NEWS
@@
On 01/02/2015 11:49 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> ... even when a source file is specified as '$(srdir)/foo.c' or
> '$(top_srcdir)/bar.c'. And ditto for dependency-tracking makefile
> fragments (those under '.deps' directories).
> +++ b/NEWS
> @@ -88,6 +88,21 @@ New in 1.16:
> using a priva
... even when a source file is specified as '$(srdir)/foo.c' or
'$(top_srcdir)/bar.c'. And ditto for dependency-tracking makefile
fragments (those under '.deps' directories).
Such issues used to occur when the 'subdir-objects' option was given.
This change should fix the second and last part of a
Stefano Lattarini writes:
> On 01/02/2015 02:16 AM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > Excellent timing, thanks!
> >
> > Now that ntp-4.2.8 is settling down, I'm looking to update our
> > Makefile.am's to use subdir-objects, and it's not being fun.
>
> (An aside: I see that ntp still uses a recursive Makefile
On 01/02/2015 02:16 AM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Excellent timing, thanks!
Now that ntp-4.2.8 is settling down, I'm looking to update our
Makefile.am's to use subdir-objects, and it's not being fun.
(An aside: I see that ntp still uses a recursive Makefile setup.
Given that you are about to mess wi
