On 29 December 2013 22:24, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> AM_PROG_AR is only required for people interested in having their package
> buildable with Microsoft tools
And we can't make "AM_PROG_AR" an automatic default? What would be the
downside?
(Sorry if I'm being a pain, but I find autotools a pa
On 12/27/2013 09:36 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 26 December 2013 15:39, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
>
>>
>> But AM_PROG_AR truly does not define $RANLIB itself. Perhaps you are
>> using libtool and calling AC_PROG_LIBTOOL or LT_INIT?
>
>
> Probably. So, how about changing the sentence from "s
tags 16291 notabug
close 16291
stop
On 12/29/2013 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
>
> While upgrading the GNU system to Automake 1.14.1, I noticed that a few
> tests emit warnings like this:
>
SKIPs are not warning, just informative messages explaining why some
tests couldn't be run.
>
Hello!
While upgrading the GNU system to Automake 1.14.1, I noticed that a few
tests emit warnings like this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
SKIP: t/spy-rm.tap 1 # SKIP /bin/rm not found
PASS: t/spy-rm.tap 2 - rm -f
SKIP: t/spy-rm.tap 3 # SKIP /bin/rm not found
