bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

2013/4/26 Stefano Lattarini : > On 04/26/2013 03:22 PM, Joshua C. wrote: >> >> It looks like you nailed this down! I couldn't fail the test in 10 >> consecutive runs. I'll say this patch fixed it. >> > Good! I will push the patch shortly. I'm not closing the bug report, > since the other failure

bug#13760: [PATCH 0/3] dry-run: don't get confused by '-I' option

tags 13760 + patch stop On 04/23/2013 11:12 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Reference: > > Hello, and sorry for the shameful delay. > > Boris Kolpackov wrote: >> >> I think if we try to support all make flavors in a combined test, >> things wil

bug#13588: Pax hangs in case big UID

On 04/26/2013 01:48 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> Actually, I prefer to keep the checks distinct, and output the problematic >> UID/GID as well (makes debugging easier). So I'd rather drop the squash-in >> patch you proposed. > > No problem :). > >>> I'm also quite afraid of testsuite performance

bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

On 04/26/2013 03:22 PM, Joshua C. wrote: > > It looks like you nailed this down! I couldn't fail the test in 10 > consecutive runs. I'll say this patch fixed it. > Good! I will push the patch shortly. I'm not closing the bug report, since the other failure is still unaddressed. Thanks, Stefan

bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

2013/4/26 Stefano Lattarini : > On 04/26/2013 12:57 PM, Joshua C. wrote: >> 2013/4/25 Stefano Lattarini : >>> On 04/20/2013 10:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Reference: Hi Joshua, sorry again for the shameful delay.

bug#13588: Pax hangs in case big UID

> Actually, I prefer to keep the checks distinct, and output the problematic > UID/GID as well (makes debugging easier). So I'd rather drop the squash-in > patch you proposed. No problem :). > > I'm also quite afraid of testsuite performance of testsuite - this > > check costs more than 6 second

bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

On 04/26/2013 12:57 PM, Joshua C. wrote: > 2013/4/25 Stefano Lattarini : >> On 04/20/2013 10:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> Reference: >>> >>> >>> Hi Joshua, sorry again for the shameful delay. >>> >>> Can you check whether the attached patc

bug#13588: Pax hangs in case big UID

On 04/26/2013 01:03 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-25 14:19, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > *snip* >> * THANKS: Likewise. >> * t/tar-ustar-id-too-high.sh: New test. >> * t/list-of-tests.mk: Add it. >> * t/tar2.sh: While at it, tweak and enhance a little. >> * t/tar3.sh: Likewise. >> * t/tar-overri

bug#13588: Pax hangs in case big UID

On 04/26/2013 12:48 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hi, I'm just thinking aloud here.. I'm ok with this. > > [SNIP] > > So *ACKing* :) with one simple remark which follows. > >> [] >> +# The $UID and $GID variables are not portable, so we need to resort >> +# to the POSIX-mandated id(1) uti

bug#13588: Pax hangs in case big UID

On 2013-04-25 14:19, Stefano Lattarini wrote: *snip* > * THANKS: Likewise. > * t/tar-ustar-id-too-high.sh: New test. > * t/list-of-tests.mk: Add it. > * t/tar2.sh: While at it, tweak and enhance a little. > * t/tar3.sh: Likewise. > * t/tar-override.sh: Likewise. > > Helped-by: Pavel Raiskup > Hel

bug#13832: Tests fail because make runs with more than one jobs

2013/4/25 Stefano Lattarini : > On 04/20/2013 10:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> Reference: >> >> >> Hi Joshua, sorry again for the shameful delay. >> >> Can you check whether the attached patch solves the failure you've been >> experiencing w

bug#13588: Pax hangs in case big UID

Hi, I'm just thinking aloud here.. I'm ok with this. > Marc Herbert adds (in bug#8343): > > When "configure" is run by a user with an UID bigger than 21 bits, > BSD pax 3.4 aborts when trying to create the 'conftest.tar' test > archive and leaves an empty or corrupted conftest.tar fil