Stefano Lattarini writes:
> So we should maybe go (after the next major release) with this naming
> scheme for the branches?
>
> * maint -> for next micro version
> * stable -> for next minor version
> * master -> for next major version
That seems to match common practice, insofar as I unde
On 2013-02-28 00:39, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 02/28/2013 12:00 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>> What I meant was that you can use (some of) my above proposed merges
>> to go forward with the new role for master instead of requiring help
>> from Savannah to allow rewriting master.
>>
>
