bug#11377: configure.am - fails to remove configure before attempting replacement

2012-05-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 11377 + moreinfo severity 11377 minor thanks Hi Ronald, sorry for the delay. On 04/28/2012 10:55 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > Under certain very reasonable scenarios, the configure file contained within > some source tree may perhaps be marked as read-only. > Before continuing, may I ask

bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-05-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Peter, thanks for the feedback. On 05/01/2012 02:23 AM, Peter Johansson wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > Sorry about this late reply. > > On 04/28/2012 12:34 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > --- a/bootstrap > +++ b/bootstrap > @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ dosubst () > { >rm -f $2 >in=`echo $1 | sed 's

bug#11387: automake 1.12 test failures

2012-05-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
severity 11387 minor tags 11387 patch close 11387 thanks Hi Bruno, thanks for the report and the detailed analysis. On 05/01/2012 11:56 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > > Would it be sufficient to rebuild automake's configure script with > autoconf 2.69 instead of 2.68? > Yes, your conclusion is corre

bug#11387: automake 1.12 test failures

2012-05-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, On a bi-arch Linux/glibc system (x86, x86_64) I'm getting 3 test failures when building for 32-bit mode: $ ./configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/arch/x86-linux/gnu \ CC="gcc -m32 -march=i586" \ CXX="g++ -m32 -march=i586" \ F77="gfortran -m32