bug#11153: change automake branching policy: dispensing with the 'branch-X.Y' branches in the future

2012-04-25 Thread Stefano Lattarini
I've now implemented the proposed branching setup, with the following steps: - I have removed the old and outdated 'next' branch (which was an ancestor of the current 'master'). - I have removed the 'branch-1.11' branch (whose tip pointed at the commit tagged by tag 'v1.11.5'). - Now th

bug#11302: Automake 1.11d on openSUSE 12.1

2012-04-25 Thread Stefano Lattarini
severity 11302 minor tags 11302 patch close 11302 thanks On 04/25/2012 01:22 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > > Yes, it fixes the test failures of > > t/posixsubst-libraries.sh > t/posixsubst-ltlibraries.sh > t/posixsubst-scripts.sh > t/transform3.sh > Thanks for confirming. I've pushed the p

bug#11306: Automake 1.11d on MacOS X

2012-04-25 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/23/2012 12:51 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 04/22/2012 08:10 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: >> >> FAIL: t/lex-libobj >> >> But setting LEXLIB to just whitespace makes the test succeed: >> >> diff -r -u automake-1.11d.orig/t/lex-libobj.sh automake-1.11d/t/lex-libobj.sh >> --- automake-1.11d.orig/

bug#11336: automake-1.11 test fail

2012-04-25 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/24/2012 09:31 PM, Fred wrote: > Hello, > Hi Fred, thanks for the report. > I compiled automake-1.11 on Debian-6.0. > Consider that Automake 1.11 is pretty old, and suffers of a known security vulnerability; I suggest you install the latest maintenance release instead (1.11.5), or wait a coup

bug#11336: automake-1.11 test fail

2012-04-25 Thread Fred
Hello, I compiled automake-1.11 on Debian-6.0. When make test finished there was a message that one test had failed and should be reported to bug-automake. Here is part of the test/test-suite.log: FAIL: specflg10.test (exit: 2) == /opt/automake-1.11/tests:/usr/l