bug#11302: Automake 1.11d on openSUSE 12.1

2012-04-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/21/2012 07:35 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: > > FAIL: t/posixsubst-libraries > > The test looks for a lib/ directory, but "make install" created a lib64/ > directory. This is due to the /usr/share/site/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > (from $CONFIG_SITE, set by /etc/profile.d/site.sh) which sets a libd

bug#11302: Automake 1.11d on openSUSE 12.1

2012-04-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Bruno, thanks for the report. On 04/21/2012 07:35 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> The beta release "1.11d" of Automake is now available at >> . > > On openSUSE 12.1 x86_64: 9 tests failed. > > FAIL: t/depcomp2.sh > FAIL: t/posixsubst-li

bug#11306: Automake 1.11d on MacOS X

2012-04-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Bruno, thanks for the report. On 04/21/2012 08:13 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: >> The beta release "1.11d" of Automake is now available at >> . > > On MacOS X 10.5, with Autoconf 2.65: 6 tests fail. > > FAIL: t/lex-libobj.sh > FAIL: t/parallel-am.sh > FAIL: t/par

bug#11306: Automake 1.11d on MacOS X

2012-04-21 Thread Bruno Haible
> The beta release "1.11d" of Automake is now available at > . On MacOS X 10.5, with Autoconf 2.65: 6 tests fail. FAIL: t/lex-libobj.sh FAIL: t/parallel-am.sh FAIL: t/parallel-am2.sh FAIL: t/parallel-am3.sh FAIL: t/tap-summary-color.sh FAIL: t/werror3.sh Detail

bug#11093: [platform-testers] Automake 1.11.3b test release

2012-04-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Stefano, > How to reproduce: > 1. Unpack automake-1.11d.tar.gz > 2. patch -p1 < > .../0001-vala-configure-exit-with-status-77-not-1-if-valac-ve.patch > 3. ./configure > 4. make I managed to work around this. The patch indeed causes the tests to be skipped, leading to: ... PASS: t/vala.sh val

bug#11302: Automake 1.11d on openSUSE 12.1

2012-04-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Stefano Lattarini wrote: > The beta release "1.11d" of Automake is now available at > . On openSUSE 12.1 x86_64: 9 tests failed. FAIL: t/depcomp2.sh FAIL: t/posixsubst-libraries.sh FAIL: t/posixsubst-ltlibraries.sh FAIL: t/posixsubst-scripts.sh FAIL: t/tap-summa

bug#11093: [platform-testers] Automake 1.11.3b test release

2012-04-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Stefano Lattarini wrote: > I think that the best fix would be to improve AM_PROG_VALAC to exit > with status '77' instead of '1' if the vala compiler found is too old; > so, what about the attached patch? Most importantly, would it fix > the failures you are seeing? The patch you sent does not ap

bug#11093: [platform-testers] Automake 1.11.3b test release

2012-04-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Bruno, thanks for the report. On 04/21/2012 02:54 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > In Automake 1.11.3b I reported these: >>> FAIL: vala-vpath.test >>> FAIL: vala-mix.test >>> FAIL: vala-mix2.test >> >>> [SNIP] >> ... >>> Looking at git://git.gnome.org/vala it is clear that the option

bug#11093: [platform-testers] Automake 1.11.3b test release

2012-04-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Stefano, In Automake 1.11.3b I reported these: > > FAIL: vala-vpath.test > > FAIL: vala-mix.test > > FAIL: vala-mix2.test > > > [SNIP] > ... > > Looking at git://git.gnome.org/vala it is clear that the option --profile > > was added on 2009-05-08, in version 0.7.3. The autoconf test reported >