On 2012-04-02 21:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Hi Peter, thanks for the feedback. But I fear we have a misunderstanding
> here. See below.
>
> On 04/02/2012 08:14 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2012-04-02 18:13, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> Severity: wishlist
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> Hello Automakers.
automake 1.11.1, autoconf 2.68, libtool 2.4, Fedora 16
I'm cross-compiling a project that has LT_INIT([win32-dll]) and has
programs as well as libraries.
After "make" I have programs (.exe) as well as libraries in .libs/
"make install" installs libraries from .libs:
libtool: install: /usr/bin/in
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
...
> WDYT? If you agree, I can apply the change below to HACKING, and
> implement the new branching policy starting from the Automke 1.12
> release.
I agree.
IMHO, you won't go wrong following git.git's example.
> diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING
...
> +* The Automake git
> "Stefano" == Stefano Lattarini writes:
Stefano> True, and that was even stated in the manual; the whole point
Stefano> of ditching support for cygnus trees is that by now those two
Stefano> big users are basically not making any real use of the 'cygnus'
Stefano> option anymore. To quote my
> "Stefano" == Stefano Lattarini writes:
Stefano> Note there's nothing I'm planning to do, nor I should do, in
Stefano> this regard: the two setups described above are both already
Stefano> supported by the current automake implementation (but the last
Stefano> one is not encouraged, even tho
On 2012-04-02 18:13, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Severity: wishlist
> thanks
>
> Hello Automakers.
>
> After some real hand-on experience with the current branching policy
> of Automake, I'm convinced the presence of the 'branch-X.Y' branches
> is just an annoyance and a source of confusion, and t
Severity: wishlist
thanks
Hello Automakers.
After some real hand-on experience with the current branching policy
of Automake, I'm convinced the presence of the 'branch-X.Y' branches
is just an annoyance and a source of confusion, and that a better policy
would be to simply have a 'maint' branch (
