bug#10434: FAIL: depmod.tap 50 - tru64 [long VPATH] make & remake

2012-02-07 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-08 00:01: > Hi Peter, thanks for the invaluable feedback. Thanks for the appreciation, but "invaluable" is perhaps a bit over the top... > On 02/07/2012 10:05 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-05 14:16: >>> +case $depmode in >>> + auto) >>>

bug#10434: FAIL: depmod.tap 50 - tru64 [long VPATH] make & remake

2012-02-07 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Peter, thanks for the invaluable feedback. On 02/07/2012 10:05 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-05 14:16: > >> So, what about the attached patch, that overhauls (and hopefully improve) >> the coverage for automatic dependency tracking support? It is probably >> possible

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-07 Thread Matthew Wezowicz
Thank you for your efforts. Even if it didn't solve the problem I know at least know where to look now. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Stefano Lattarini < stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> wrote: > tags 10671 - moreinfo > tags 10671 + notabug > close 10671 > thanks > > On 02/07/2012 09:39 PM, Matthew

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-07 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 10671 - moreinfo tags 10671 + notabug close 10671 thanks On 02/07/2012 09:39 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote: > The script prints the following to the console: > > + mkdir am.dir > + cd am.dir > + cat > + echo 'int bar () { return 0; }' > + mkdir sub > + echo 'choke me' > + st=0 > + gcc -I. -I./s

bug#10434: FAIL: depmod.tap 50 - tru64 [long VPATH] make & remake

2012-02-07 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-05 14:16: > On 02/02/2012 11:41 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-02 22:45: >>> Reference: >>> >>> >>> OK, the attached patch fixes the two spurious failures of GCC forced into >>> Tru64 m

bug#10434: FAIL: depmod.tap 50 - tru64 [long VPATH] make & remake

2012-02-07 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-05 14:16: > On 02/02/2012 11:41 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-02 22:45: >>> Reference: >>> >>> >>> OK, the attached patch fixes the two spurious failures of GCC forced into >>> Tru64 m

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-07 Thread Matthew Wezowicz
The script prints the following to the console: + mkdir am.dir + cd am.dir + cat + echo 'int bar () { return 0; }' + mkdir sub + echo 'choke me' + st=0 + gcc -I. -I./sub -c -o foo.o foo.c In file included from foo.c:1: ./sub/bar.h:1: error: expected `=', `,', `;', `asm' or `__attribute__' before `

bug#10737: test-suite.log with 1 test failed.

2012-02-07 Thread Stefano Lattarini
severity 10737 minor tags 10737 patch close 10737 thanks Hi Larry, thanks for the report. And sorry for the late answer, but your message has reached the mailing list just today :-/ On 01/31/2012 04:30 AM, Larry Daniel wrote: > > > = > GNU Automake

bug#10737: test-suite.log with 1 test failed.

2012-02-07 Thread Larry Daniel
= GNU Automake 1.11: tests/test-suite.log = 1 of 628 tests failed. (101 tests were not run). .. contents:: :depth: 2 FAIL: aclocal5.test (exit: 1) = /home/larry/automak

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-07 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Matthew, sorry for the delay. On 02/01/2012 06:53 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote: > All bits may have been accidentally set when I scp'ed stdinc.dir to my > Windows machine for inspection. > I sent the .tar from it. > > I believe the SELinux is installed by default on CentOS 6.2 and I didn't > cha