On Tuesday 10 January 2012 16:10:29 Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2012-01-10 15:41 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 09 January 2012 18:49:28 Eric Blake wrote:
> > > On 01/09/2012 03:46 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > It creates the needed files, but exits with status 1. Is there anyway
> > >
On 2012-01-10 15:41 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2012 18:49:28 Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 01/09/2012 03:46 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > It creates the needed files, but exits with status 1. Is there anyway
> > > to generate config.sub without relying on Automake,
> >
> > U
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 18:03:
>>> It would probably be worthwhile to try to understand why this is the case.
>>> As a wild guess, would this work?
>>>
>>> - ( sleep 1 ) &
>>> + sh -c "cd '$abs_builddir'; sleep 1" &
>>
>> No, fails in the same way as the original.
>>
> Sorry, by bad,
>> It would probably be worthwhile to try to understand why this is the case.
>> As a wild guess, would this work?
>>
>> - ( sleep 1 ) &
>> + sh -c "cd '$abs_builddir'; sleep 1" &
>
> No, fails in the same way as the original.
>
Sorry, by bad, I meant this: sh -c "cd '$ac_abs_srcdir'; sleep 1
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 16:02:
> On 01/10/2012 02:13 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 13:44:
>>> On 01/10/2012 12:35 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
One further data point; changing that "( sleep 1 ) &" thing followed by a
wait just before AC_OUTPUT into
On 01/10/2012 02:13 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 13:44:
>> On 01/10/2012 12:35 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>>
>>> One further data point; changing that "( sleep 1 ) &" thing followed by a
>>> wait just before AC_OUTPUT into an inlined sleep also fixes the test case.
>>>
>
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 13:44:
> On 01/10/2012 12:35 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-01-10 11:12:
>>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 10:50:
[2] Now that I think of it, my knee-jerk guess is that the "( sleep 1 ) &"
put in configure by AM_SANITY_CHECK is
On 01/10/2012 05:44 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 01/10/2012 12:35 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-01-10 11:12:
>>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 10:50:
[2] Now that I think of it, my knee-jerk guess is that the "( sleep 1 ) &"
put in configure by AM_SANITY_C
On 01/10/2012 12:35 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-01-10 11:12:
>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 10:50:
>>> [2] Now that I think of it, my knee-jerk guess is that the "( sleep 1 ) &"
>>> put in configure by AM_SANITY_CHECK is the likely culprit.
>>
>> I tried that hypothes
Peter Rosin skrev 2012-01-10 11:12:
> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 10:50:
>> [2] Now that I think of it, my knee-jerk guess is that the "( sleep 1 ) &"
>> put in configure by AM_SANITY_CHECK is the likely culprit.
>
> I tried that hypothesis and bumped this to "( sleep 2 ) &", and the te
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 10:50:
> Hi Peter.
>
> On 01/10/2012 12:15 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-01-10 00:07:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> distcheck-configure-flags-am.test fails on MSYS.
>>
> Is this failure consistently reproducible, or racy? If racy, do you have
> an estimate
Hi Peter.
On 01/10/2012 12:15 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-01-10 00:07:
>> Hi!
>>
>> distcheck-configure-flags-am.test fails on MSYS.
>
Is this failure consistently reproducible, or racy? If racy, do you have
an estimate of its frequency?
>> I think the cause is
>> that some p
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-10 09:48:
> Hi Eric, Peter, and thanks to both for the super-quick diagnosis and fix.
>
> On 01/10/2012 12:52 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Eric Blake skrev 2012-01-10 00:34:
*snip*
>>> Ah - the classic bash bug documented in the autoconf manual:
>>>
*snip*
>>
>> That w
Hi Eric, Peter, and thanks to both for the super-quick diagnosis and fix.
On 01/10/2012 12:52 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Eric Blake skrev 2012-01-10 00:34:
>> On 01/09/2012 03:42 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> FWIW, this "fixes" it, but I don't actually know why a subshell would
>>> make a difference?
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
