bug#9768: Makefile broken after removing included *.am file

2011-11-22 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 23 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Hi Ralf. > > On Thursday 20 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > > I hope so :-) -- otherwise I've completely misunderstood something > > c

bug#10111: remake rules can fail in a weird corner case (VPATH into $distdir).

2011-11-22 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Severity: minor thanks This report describes a failure of the automake-generated remake rules in a particular, low-probability scenario. I admit upfront that the scenario I'm speaking about is pretty corner-case, and very unlikely to be problemtic in practice. Still, I think it's still worth hav

bug#10026: [PATCH] texinfo: work around Solaris 10 xpg4 shell bug in install rules (was: Re: bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Solaris 10 [3] (XPG4 sh, Sun Studio compilers, autoconf 2.62) [almost O

2011-11-22 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Saturday 19 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Saturday 12 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > SETUP: > > Solaris 10, "rich /usr/local" (e.g., contains `expr' from GNU coreutils > > 6.9 and gawk 3.1.5), VPATH build, perl 5.10.0, autoconf 2.62, testsuite > > run with GNU m