On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Jack Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:55 AM, tsuna wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini
>> wrote:
>>> As my java foo is pretty weak, I'm not sure how to handle jar manifests,
>>> jar entry points, or other jar/javac subtleties and
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:55 AM, tsuna wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
>> As my java foo is pretty weak, I'm not sure how to handle jar manifests,
>> jar entry points, or other jar/javac subtleties and advanced features.
>> Suggestions welcome.
>
> You can cre
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> You're right; the documentation on Java support should be definitely
> be improved (especially making better distinction between usual bytecode
> compilation with javac and "native/binary compilation" with gcj).
I just sent a trivial pat
[Adding bug-automake in CC:, so that we won't forget about the issue]
On Thursday 14 July 2011, tsuna wrote:
> Hi all,
> whether I like it or not, it so happens that I have a Java project I'm
> trying to package properly, and I'm trying to use autoconf/automake
> for maximum portability and ease
