On Friday 04 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Peter, all, and sorry for the delay,
>
> * Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 04:22:32PM CET:
> > On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > >Through testing I found out again that DejaGNU does not cope with white
> >
On 4 March 2011 17:14, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Reuben Thomas wrote on Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:42:33PM CET:
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> We could just provide thin-layer support for both latexmk and/or rubber.
This sounds good, and John Collins has pointed out that latexmk does
provide dependency inform
Hello Peter, all, and sorry for the delay,
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 04:22:32PM CET:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >Through testing I found out again that DejaGNU does not cope with white
> >space in absolute directory names anyway, regardless of srcd
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:42:33PM CET:
>
> Thoughts?
We could just provide thin-layer support for both latexmk and/or rubber.
That would probably be the least amount of work, both inside Automake,
and for getting any missing bits into the upstream projects.
Thanks,
Ralf
