Hello Юрий,
* Юрий Пухальский wrote on Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:48:08PM CET:
> I've (finally) made it through two implicit rules, but i have a problem there.
>
> The makefile looks something like that:
>
>
> .SUFFIXES: .pc .lo .c
> .pc.c:
> cp $< $@
> .c.lo:
>
2011/1/11 Ralf Wildenhues :
> Hello Юрий,
>
> * Юрий Пухальский wrote on Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:48:08PM CET:
>> I've (finally) made it through two implicit rules, but i have a problem
>> there.
>>
>> The makefile looks something like that:
>>
>>
>> .SUFFIXES: .pc .lo .c
>
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:40:13PM CET:
> On Monday 10 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:50:13PM CET:
> > > But the above is not always correct, as some of these files are
> > > distributed
> > > *only* if other
Good day, Ralf!
I've (finally) made it through two implicit rules, but i have a problem there.
The makefile looks something like that:
.SUFFIXES: .pc .lo .c
.pc.c:
cp $< $@
.c.lo:
cp $< $@
Given that i have no .c and no .lo befor
