Re: GNU Automake 1.11 released

2009-05-19 Thread Antonio Diaz Diaz
Congratulations on the new release. Ralf Wildenhues wrote: - "make dist" can now create xz-compressed tarballs, as well as (deprecated?) lzma-compressed tarballs. Do you plan to support the creation of lzip-compressed tarballs? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2008-11/msg00076

Re: automake-1.11 test failure on darwin9 - instmany-python.test

2009-05-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Can you check whether the patch I pointed out exposes the problem, or > whether it existed before? From the ed script above I can't tell, and > the instmany-python.test is new in this release. Removing the patch still gives /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ../../long_subdir_n

Re: GNU Automake 1.11 released

2009-05-19 Thread Richard M Stallman
Congratulations on the new release.

Re: automake-1.11 test failure on darwin9 - instmany-python.test

2009-05-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:01:49PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:43:00AM CEST: > >> The instmany-python test is failing for me on Mac OS X 10.5.7. Looks > >> like it is trying to install things into /Library/Py

Re: automake-1.11 test failure on darwin9 - instmany-python.test

2009-05-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Peter, > > thanks for the bug report. > > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:43:00AM CEST: >> The instmany-python test is failing for me on Mac OS X 10.5.7. Looks >> like it is trying to install things into /Library/Python, and as I did >> not run mak

Re: automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-05-19 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
apply the first patch attached to this message, then run make cd tests make recheck and post the detailed log of that, so we can find out why the chmod fails? (If you don't have the build tree any more, then you can run 'make check' instead of 'make recheck', but it will