On Monday 06 April 2009 16:32:35 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Reuben Thomas wrote on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:15:43PM CEST:
> > On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> what would be cool is if automake processed some GNU makeisms in the .am
> >> -> .in step. personally, i use some things like
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What do you mean by "allow it to be required". You can require it now
for your package using autotools.
Right, and my original question was to ask "how do I require GNU Make in an
autotoolised package?" I'm still don't see an "official" answer to th
Hello Reuben,
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:15:43PM CEST:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>> what would be cool is if automake processed some GNU makeisms in the .am ->
>> .in step. personally, i use some things like $(wildcard) and $(patsubst)
>> because i hate h
Hello Rainer,
let's keep the mailing list in Cc:, thanks.
* Rainer Tammer wrote on Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:50:39AM CEST:
> Yes,
> this fixes the test. Unfortunately test libtool7.test and libtool9.test
> still fail (details see below).
Thanks for reporting these failures. I have seen them befor
