Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Bob Proulx ha escrit:
> > I believe that it is very well known and well propagated knowledge
> > that the strings yy and YY are often used to mutate the result into a
> > unique identifier. Almost all practical documentation uses sed
> > substitution in the examples. In
Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit:
> I believe that it is very well known and well propagated knowledge
> that the strings yy and YY are often used to mutate the result into a
> unique identifier. Almost all practical documentation uses sed
> substitution in the examples. In fact this may
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues ha escrit:
> > Can s/yy/.../ change anything unintended? E.g., do we need to ensure it
> > only changes words beginning with yy?
>
> In theory it could, for example if the programmer used identifiers
> beginning with, or containing `yy'. However, I can h
* Sergey Poznyakoff wrote on Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 02:04:29PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit:
>
> > Can s/yy/.../ change anything unintended? E.g., do we need to ensure it
> > only changes words beginning with yy?
>
> In theory it could, for example if the programmer used i
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit:
> Can s/yy/.../ change anything unintended? E.g., do we need to ensure it
> only changes words beginning with yy?
In theory it could, for example if the programmer used identifiers
beginning with, or containing `yy'. However, I can hardly imagine
so
Hello Sergey,
* Sergey Poznyakoff wrote on Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:15:32PM CEST:
>
> Some (rather long) time ago, I proposed an extension to ylwrap that
> would enable it to provide a functionality similar to that
> of `bison -p prefix', i.e. replacing `yy' prefix in idenifiers with
> the given s
* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:15:56PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think this should be applied to HEAD and branch-1-10.
> > Would you like me to do it?
>
> Yes, please. And thanks for your review; your points all look right
> to me.
Thanks. This
