On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:14:11AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61.
> You have another version of autoconf.
>
> is causing a major regression in the functioning of automake and the GNU
> build system. Namely, a change in Makefile
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this should be applied to HEAD and branch-1-10.
> Would you like me to do it?
Yes, please. And thanks for your review; your points all look right
to me.
> So this is yet another reason to keep Autoconf version incompatibilities
> as few as p
Hello world,
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:16:32PM CEST:
> According to Paul Eggert on 6/20/2007 11:36 PM:
> >
> > +[m4_warning([this file was generated for autoconf $ac_version.
> > +You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but it may not.
> > +If you have problems, yo
* Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:42:18AM CEST:
> On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 09:18 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > All fair. Except I simply don't see a use case for this yet, nor do I
> > see what `something' should mean in this case. If you can create a
> > sensible use case,
Hello Tomaž,
Thanks for the bug report. Unfortunately, it is not enough information
for me to go by yet.
* Tomaž Žveglič wrote on Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 07:36:35PM CEST:
> automake-1.9:
> automake-1.9: ## Internal Error ##
> automake-1.9:
> automake-1.9: u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Paul Eggert on 6/20/2007 11:36 PM:
> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Are we now supposed to edit Makefile.in by hand each time we modify
>> Makefile.am?
>
> I hope not. How about the following (untested) Automake patch?
L
