Hello,
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:06:17PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> Thank you both for getting back to me.
>
> >I share Ralf's feelings, but I do not see many options here:
> > - you may generate a *.texi stub, as you suggest
> > - you may compute foo.texi is from foo.dbk in bthe bootstrap scri
Thank you both for getting back to me.
I share Ralf's feelings, but I do not see many options here:
- you may generate a *.texi stub, as you suggest
- you may compute foo.texi is from foo.dbk in bthe bootstrap script
- or you may refrain from using info_TEXINFOS and put the rules to
Makefi
Hello Noah and Ralf,
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:01:04AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Well, yes, automake needs to know about @setfilename to infer the info
> file name, whether you include a `version.texi' file, and similar
> things.
yes, Automake is currently written that way. But it present
Hello Noah,
* Noah Slater wrote on Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:36:26PM CEST:
>
> I generate my "foo.texi" Texinfo documentation from DocBook
> ("foo.dbk") and using the info_TEXINFOS rule in my Makefile.am causes
> automake to check for "foo.texi" before completing.
Well, yes, automake needs to know
