On 10/10/06, Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Alex Unleashed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> the fact of the attempt is what> really matters,I'm afraid I'll have to disagree on this one, as a matter of
philosophy. Autoconf regularly tries stuff to see whether it works.It's not at all unreason
"Alex Unleashed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the fact of the attempt is what
> really matters,
I'm afraid I'll have to disagree on this one, as a matter of
philosophy. Autoconf regularly tries stuff to see whether it works.
It's not at all unreasonable for Autoconf to try programs that have
me
[Cced to and for further
discussion. Which list is appropriate here?]
Hello!
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=automake&pr=492
It's been some time, but this issue is still outstandi
On 10/10/06, Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The difference with other mkdir versions is that GNU mkdir does not try to
> chmod() the directory if it didn't just create it. The mkdir I'm currently> testing is FreeBSD's. It always chmod()'s the directory when a mode is> specified, no matte
